How can they be studied?
You see that a typical DNA molecule is thousands of times larger than an
atomic nucleus, yet it's very hard to study. The same applies to subatomic
particles; we have theories and assumptions with a handful of verified
points, and this minority of verified facts leads us to the rest of the
picture. Many Ancient philosophers believed that if we keep breaking
objects, we will reach a point where it would be unbreakable. We call this
particle an atom, but it has turned out that it's breakable if we right
tool.
The clear and successful attempt was made in the 1860s, when scientists
were using partially vacuumed tubes or jars and applied currents with
thousands of Volts. They used to see streams of glowing particles moving
from one end of the tube. One of these tubes is called Crookes' tube,
named after its developer, an English scientist, William Crookes. You
can Google it and/or watch videos.
This is a glass chamber; one end has an anode (-) from where conventional
current enters, and the other end has a cathode (+) where current leaves.
A pump is connected to remove air and create a vacuum. When its pressure
is about a thousandth of the general atmospheric pressure (atm), the
battery or whatever gives it electrical energy is turned on. At a few
1000-10,000 Volts and appropriate pressure, the gas usually glows in
yellow-green color. The direction of its beam goes from - to + or anode to
cathode.
If you just keep applying deadly voltages but with standard atm, nothing
happens. If you keep the pressure at about 1/100 of atm, the gas reveals
its type. For example, if we use Hydrogen gas, it glows blue or white in
the case of Carbon Dioxide. Whereas lower pressures like 1/1000 atm, it
glows yellow-green; if the pressure is decreased further, then the glow
disappears.
These rays are called cathode rays; they are not electromagnetic
radiations like light; instead, they are the result of electrons being
peeled away from their nuclei. These types of rays are the result of
particle streams, not of photons. They move from the anode to the cathode
side, meaning it's negatively charged and its particles are named
corpuscles by J.J. Thomson, but
G. Johnstone Stoney suggested the name electron.
When we take spectra of such rays, as we do with sunlight and reveal a
rainbow, we see tiny lines which are made by microscopic lines further,
interpretation of these lines led to the development of quantum mechanics
and atomic structure, therefore, by several experiments we have discovered
hundreds of subatomic particle classes. We'll explore them in this
article.
Basis of division:
Since we have numerous subatomic particle varieties, it becomes crucial
to know how we will recognize them from one another. Well, there are
three main characteristics of each of these particles: Mass, Charge, and
Spin. Let's see them briefly.
Mass:
It might feel funny to measure the mass of a subatomic particle due to
its extremely small size (almost nothing). It's not the same mass as the
mass of a basketball, a table, or daily life objects; it's a quantum
property. We'll see it in further sections. Actually, when subatomic
particles move in 3D space, they resist the acceleration, and this tiny
amount of resistance is provided by interactions with the Higgs field.
It's measured in eV or electron volts, it's an extremely
small amount of energy, about 1.602 x 10 ⁻¹⁹ Joules. Which is
equivalent to the energy gained by an electron, if it accelerates with a
potential difference of 1 Volt.
Of course, this energy is almost nothing to us, but electrons, quarks, or
their homies have way more mass. Therefore, we use MeV (million/mega
electron volts) and GeV (billion/giga electron volts). In convenient ways,
the mass is expressed as eV/c², which means the electron volt is divided
by light speed squared, thanks to Uncle Einstein's equation
E = mc².
It also means the more massive the particle, the more energy it will need
to push or drag. Well, who cares, our most relaxed breath becomes a storm
to them :)
Charge:
Since many of the subatomic particles are charged, meaning they tend to
interact with electromagnetic and field forces. These particles interact
with electromagnetic forces (EMF) with a certain amount of charge
measured in coulombs (C). The elementary charge is
1.602 x 10⁻¹⁹ C; this constant is denoted by e.
This charge could be either Positive or Negative; the particles with the
same polarities would repel, and the opposite would attract. For
example, two or more positives (or negatives) would repel, and the
opposite would attract.
Spin:
Like mass, it's not a classical property, as many of you who are
interested in subatomic particle physics know that Spin is a misleading
term to describe this quantum property. Let's see where the idea of
spinning particles came from.
Earlier spectroscopists noticed that in atomic spectra, there were fine
doublet lines that don't contribute to forming thick lines and can't be
explained with wave functions or the wave nature of particles alone.
These were also unexplainable by charge and mass.
Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit felt the need for another quantum property. This
was theorized as an intrinsic angular momentum, which is zero for scalar
bosons, one for gauge bosons, and half for fermions. It's a quantum
property, not a classical spin; it can't be explained in its true form,
but we can estimate it from the observations of spectroscopy. Let's try to
grasp it since you have already understood the concept of mass and charge.
In quantum mechanics, we assume every subatomic particle, whether it's a
photon, boson, electron, atom, or molecule, carries the properties of both
a particle and a wave. Every single particle, like an electron, is a
ripple or disturbance in its corresponding field.
Imagine calm water in a pond, you throw a stone in the water, and you see
concentric waves that keep expanding outward. In this case, the water acts
as a field, the waves' central point, meaning where your stone fell on the
water, acts as the electron's probable location, not exact. Because you
can't map the position and momentum of subatomic particles together, if
you know one aspect, then the other would be automatically uncertain; we
call this the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg.
That's why we call an electron a tiny ripple/disturbance in the electron
field; you can also assign wavelengths, amplitude, phase, or frequency to
electrons like a wave. Our stone's ripple doesn't have a thing like half
spin, but electrons, including all the fermions, have one. Let's see this
phenomenon more closely.
A zero spin would mean neither ripples moving outward nor inward, just
scattered without motion. Full spin would denote ripples moving outward or
inward constantly; half spin would be like waves expanding outward for a
period, then contracting, then expanding, and this cycle continues. Again,
we say this is just a way to grasp this quantum property; it's not
a true ripple, spinning ball, or anything that we've seen in this world.
Every theory and suggestion that explains the half spin is just a
metaphorical way, not the truth. It's just impossible. Actually, the spin
was coined for a property of a subatomic particle to explain its
surrounding fields like Higgs field, EM, and so forth. It's kinda phase
transition, and math does suggest it's an angular momentum, but not a
classical spin.
Quantum mechanics has successfully made us understand this
phenomenon. Like light, we can't see its photons, but our eyes see
everything through it. We can't explain what happens actually; we only map
those ripples around such a particle and have terms like spin, and people
instinctively think tiny balls twisting, turning, and rotating, but it's
far from reality. It has nothing to do with spin that we recognize; it's
just a quantum property.
Spin is not the property of the particle itself; instead, it's the field
disturbance/ripple's property that can be half, full, or zero, which is
what we've been successfully measuring for a century. Forget anything
you can imagine, anything rotating in the case of subatomic particles,
it's just a term to define a quantum property. Further, we'll meet some
more confusing terms, but let's not be confused.
As you've the basic understanding about mass, charge, and spin, we can
easily recognize the subatomic particles, and we are free to explore
this zoo.
Fermions:
|
|
A Nucleus and its orbiting electron
|
All the subatomic particles that have half-spin are called fermions;
they obey Pauli's exclusion principle. According to this
principle, no two identical fermions can share one state. What does that
mean? Subatomic particles are basically defined by a set of quantum
properties or numbers, like values of their energies, spin, charge,
symmetries, and others. No two fermions can have these numbers the same;
if some properties are the same, then they might share one state.
If no two fermions can share the same states, you might say, what about
many protons and neutrons living in one atomic nucleus? Well, they do
share the same house, but their energies, spins, and charges are arranged
in a way that Pauli's principle can't kick them out. For example, an s
orbital has two electrons, which are fermions. Their spins would be
alternative to each other; we call them ripples to make you understand,
but they aren't ripples actually; it's intrinsic angular momentum but not
spin.
This way, one electron's spin is denoted by an up arrow and its
partner enters down arrow spin, then first changes into down and
second into up, and this cycle continues. Protons and neutrons don't orbit
the nucleus, but their spin and other quantum numbers are defined this way
so that Pauli's rule can't be violated and threaten their existence. You
see? No two fermions can have the same quantum state.
We have two kinds of Fermions based on their interactions with fundamental
forces and other properties; they are called quarks and
leptons. Quarks are the building blocks of composite particles,
hadrons, which means when any 3 compatible kinds of quarks meet, they
create a hadron. While the leptons are fundamental, they don't have any
elementary particles. However, quarks are usually seen in groups; some
theories suggest they can also live a free life, but they lack
observational evidence.
Physicists use fractional numbers for some particles to define their
quantum traits. If you see a quark with charge 2/3e, it means it's
two-thirds of the fundamental charge 1.602 x 10⁻¹⁹ C. It becomes
more important because a lepton carries this minute charge fully, either
positive or negative, but quarks aren't found in free conditions; we cite
protons or neutrons as their true homes. Since quarks make composite
particles like mesons, protons, neutrons, etc., it's important to define
them as a denominator of 3.
In the chart, we've used some color-coded properties for clarity, for
example, white for MeV, orange for GeV, and so on. We've added
anti-fermions, their symbols, and color charges for quarks and gluons. You
can use this chart for your own purpose. If you aim to use it in online
work like YouTube or other social media, you can add a
contribution link to our blog, CosmicWisdom. You see only
the 1080p version, while the original is 8k. Prepared with high-quality
render and graphics of Ryzen 5 5600X and GTX 1660 Super, its uncompressed
Tif image to prevent any compression artifacts that can desecrate this
chart.